VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2026 › High Court of Delhi

Sanjay and Anr v. State(Govt.Nct of Delhi) and Anr

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
24 August 2026
Bench
Saurabh Banerjeeauthor
Case no.
CRL.M.C. 6249/2026

Judgment

O R D E R %

24.08.2026

¶1By virtue of the present petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.42/2023 dated 23.01.2023 registered at PS.: New Ashok Nagar under Sections 308/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code,1860 (IPC) and all proceedings emanating therefrom as the petitioners and respondent no.2 have mutually settled all their disputes vide Settlement dated 12.05.2026.

¶2Issue notice.

¶3Learned APP for the State accepts notice and submits that she has no objection to the quashing of the aforesaid FIR.

¶4Respondent no.2 also accepts notice and submits that he has no objection if the present petition is allowed.

¶5This Court has further had the occasion of interacting with the petitioners as well as the respondent no.2, who all are present in Court. This is a digitally signed order. They affirm the terms of the aforesaid Settlement dated 12.05.2026, wherein it is recorded that the petitioners and the respondent no.2 have amicable settled all their disputes inter se themselves and they have agreed to put a quietus to their disputes. Respondent no.2 hence submits that he does not wish to continue with the aforesaid FIR against the petitioners.

¶6The petitioners and the respondent no.2, present in Court, as well as their credentials, as on record, have been duly identified by the IO.

¶7As noted above, a settlement based on mutual terms between the petitioners and the respondent no.2 is the basis of filing the present petition, which is accompanied by their respective affidavit(s) qua the said effect. In view thereof, the present is a fit case for quashing the aforesaid FIR. Accordingly, as also following the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Jitendra Raghuvanshi & Ors. vs. Babita Raguvanshi & Anr.: (2013) 4 SCC 58, Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab & Anr.: (2012) 10 SCC 303 and Narinder Singh & Ors. vs. State of Punjab & Anr.:

(2014) 6 SCC 466, and also since there is nothing left to corroborate and prove the case of the prosecution, continuation of the present FIR will be an exercise in futility.

¶8Accordingly, the present petition is allowed and FIR No.42/2023 dated 23.01.2023 registered at PS.: New Ashok Nagar under Sections 308/506/34 of the IPC and all proceedings emanating therefrom are hereby quashed.

¶9As such, the present petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

SAURABH BANERJEE, J AUGUST 24, 2026/Ab This is a digitally signed order.

Case details

Parties and counsel

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010397002026 + CRL.M.C. 6249/2026 SANJAY AND ANR .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Subhash Chandra Lochakia, Adv. versus STATE(GOVT.NCT OF DELHI) AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, APP for the State with Ms. Vanshika Singh and Mr. Bhanu Pratap Singh, Advocates. SI- K.P. Singh, PS: New Ashok Nagar CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.