- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 25 August 2026
- Bench
- Om Prakash Shukla
- Case no.
- O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 680/2026
Judgment
ORDER (ORAL) %
25.08.2026 I.A. 23349/2026 (Exemption from filing certified copies)
¶1Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
¶2The application stands disposed of. O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 680/2026
¶3The present petition has been filed under Section 29A(4) and 29A(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 19961 seeking further extension of the mandate of the learned Sole Arbitrator by six months.
¶4The mandate of the learned Tribunal was initially extended by mutual consent of the parties under Section 29A(3) of the Act till
1 "Act" hereinafter Signed By:GUNN
O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 680/2026
10.12.2025. Thereafter, this Court, vide order dated 11.02.2026, further extended the mandate for a period of 6 months.
¶5In regard to the stage of the proceedings, learned Counsel for the Petitioner submits that the pleadings are complete, evidence of both sides has been concluded, and the matter is presently at the stage of final arguments.
¶6Issue notice.
¶7Notice is accepted by Mr. Aman Gupta, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Respondent.
¶8Learned Counsel for the Respondent has no objection to the extension of the mandate of the learned Sole Arbitrator.
¶9In view of the consensus between the parties, the mandate of the learned Sole Arbitrator is extended for a further period of six months to conclude the arbitral proceedings and render the award. The period till the date of the present order is also regularised.
¶10The learned Sole Arbitrator shall endeavour to conclude the proceedings and render the award within the extended period.
¶11The present petition is disposed of in the above terms.
OM PRAKASH SHUKLA, J AUGUST 25, 2026/pa
Signed By:GUNN
Case details
Parties and counsel
O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 680/2026 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010400232026 + O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 680/2026 RAMESH KUMAR RANAIK .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Suhasini Sen, Mr. Rahul Kripalani, Ms. Rayana Mukherjee, Ms. Aeshva Salwan and Mr. Sista Srinivas, Advocates. versus M/S SHYAM INDUS POWER SOLUTIONS PVT. LTD .....Respondent Through: Mr. Aman Gupta and Mr. Divyam Kandhani, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLA
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.