- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 31 August 2026
- Bench
- Swarana Kanta Sharma
- Case no.
- W.P.(C) 12617/2026
Judgment
O R D E R %
31.08.2026 CM APPL. 58520/2026 (exemption)
¶1Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
¶2Application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 12617/2026 & CM APPL. 58519/2026
¶3By way of the present petition, the petitioner is seeking following prayers: "!) A Writ in the nature of 'Mandamus' or an appropriate writ, Order or Direction thereby directing the Respondent No. 112 to take appropriate legal action against the Respondent No. 3 on account of non-filing of the annual The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. list of office bearers of the managing Committee/Governing Body after its registration on 16.04.2015 upto date as provided under section 4 of Societies Registration Act, to investigate /inquire into the management and affairs of the Respondent No.3, to enquire into the various unauthorized amendments so made in the "Original Byelaws" & framing of unauthorized/illegal "Election Bye-laws" contrary to the Main Bye-laws and Rules & Regulations as framed and approved in the Annual General Meeting held on
07.07.2024 and 07.06.2026 contrary to Section 12 and 12A & 12D of the Societies Registration Act, 1860 and I or cancel its Registration as 'Society' because no action was taken despite repeated complaints by the petitioner and other members of RW A/society including letters I complaints dated 27 .02.2025, 07.03.2025, 13.03.2025, 09.06.2026, 29.06.2026 ~ 15.07.2026 and because also some of the office bearers of the Managing Committee of RWA/respondent No. 3 have deliberately failed to achieve/ fulfil its main social obligations towards its society and using the funds of the RW A/Society for past several years mainly for their personal benefit/objects, etc by exercising powers and jurisdiction the vested with this court under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India as well as in the interest of natural justice; II. A writ or order thereby taking appropriate legal action against the respondent concerned on account of dereliction of statutory and function and violation of section 4, 12, 12A & 12D of Societies Registration Act, 1860 and other provision of law as applicable in the case in the interest of the majority of residents of the R WA/ respondent No.3."
¶4Issue notice. The learned CGSC accepts notice on behalf of respondent/UOI.
¶5Having heard learned counsel for the parties and having regard to the nature of the relief sought in the present petition, this Court finds it appropriate to direct that the present petition be treated as a representation on behalf of the petitioner. The respondents shall consider and decide the present representation, along with the other representations/complaints already submitted by the petitioner on the same subject, in accordance with law, within a period of eight weeks from today, under intimation to the petitioner.
¶6In above terms, the present petition stands disposed of.
¶7In case of any further grievance, the petitioner will be at liberty to The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. approach this Court by way of a fresh writ petition.
¶8The order be uploaded on the website forthwith. DR. SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J AUGUST 31, 2026/vc VS The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
Case details
Parties and counsel
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010407302026 + W.P.(C) 12617/2026 & CM APPL. 58519/2026 MS. NEETU GAUR .....Petitioner Through: Counsel (appearance not given) versus REGISTRAR OF SOCIETIES (DISTRICT-WEST) AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Arun Kumar Tiwari, CGSC, Mr. Saurabh Kumar Nagar, GP, Ms. Priya Sharma, Mr. Binod Kumar Upadhyay, Advocates for UOI. CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMA
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.