VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2011 › High Court of Delhi

Sanjeev & Ors v. State & Anr

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
22 November 2011
Bench
Mukta Guptaauthor
Case no.
CRL.M.C. 1593/2011

Judgment

ORDER oh

22.11.2011 This is a petition for quashing of FIR No. 31012000 under Sections 498N406134IPC registered at PS Uttam Nagar, Delhi. The complainant/Respondent No. 2 Ms. Saraswati is present in person and is identified by her counsel. She states that the Petitioners and Respondent No.2/Complainant have entered into a Compromise. In terms of the settlement, marriage between the Petitioner No. 1 and Respondent No. 2lcomplainant has. been dissolved by a decree of divorce. As part of full and final settlement of all the claims of the Respondent No. 2,the Petitioner CRL.M.C. L593I2OIT SANJEEV & ORS Through '! CRL.M.C. 1s93/2011 Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. ?* {5 No. l.has paid T15,000/- to her in Court today by way of cash. She fuither states that in view of the settlement between the parties, she does not want to pursub the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. In view of the fact that the parties have amicably resolved their differences of their own free will, volition and without any coercion and no useful purpose will be served in continuance of the proceedings, rather the same would create fuither acrimony between them, it would be in the interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. Consequently, FIR No. 310/2000 under Sections 498N406134 IPC registered at PS Uttam Nagar, Delhi and proceedings pursuant thereto are hereby quashed. Parties have signed this order sheet in acknowledgment of their statements made before this Court. The petition is disposed of. Order dasti. MUKTA GUPTA,J NOVEMBER 22,2011 w l(oloE E p 'gu' sb\"ts CRL.M.C. 1s?3/2011 page 2 of2 $"-.,tPett /Z--Ns' \r'Nr )fts-Q)'!'^$"' ,l,r'*'

Case details

Parties and counsel

$-2e * TN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ..... Petitioner N4r. Sumit Tyagi, Adv, with petitioners in person. VETSUS STATE & ANR ..... Respondent \4r. Mukesh Gupta, APP for State with SI Narendra kumar, PS Fatehpur Beri IVIr. J.K. Dhingra, Adv. for R-2 with R-2 in person. Through CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.