Arvind Singhal v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi

O R D E R %

01.09.2026

¶1The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following reliefs: The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

¶2The grievance of the petitioner is that a vacation notice has been served on the petitioner on 31st July, 2026, which makes reference to a demolition order. However, a copy of the demolition order has not been supplied to the petitioner. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

¶3The aforesaid contention of the petitioner is rebutted by counsel for the respondent/MCD, who submits that the demolition order has duly been sent to the petitioner through speed post. He further submits that partial demolition action was also carried out on 20th August, 2026, pursuant to the said demolition order.

¶4Without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the parties, the demolition order has been supplied in Court today.

¶5In view thereof, counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the present writ petition, with liberty to invoke the appellate remedy available in law.

¶6The petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with the aforesaid liberty. AMIT BANSAL, J SEPTEMBER 1, 2026 at The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010410062026 + W.P.(C) 12663/2026 & CM APPL. 58856/2026 ARVIND SINGHAL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ajjay Arora, Senior Advocate with Mr. Arush Kapoor & Mr.Vansh Luthra, Advocates. versus MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Pritish Sabharwal, Ms. Shweta Singh & Mr. Faiz Bakshi, Advocates for MCD with Mr. Faiz Bakshi, AE, Central Zone, MCD. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL