- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 1 September 2026
- Bench
- Anil Kshetarpal, Shail Jain (Through Vc)
- Case no.
- W.P.(C) 12669/2026
Judgment
O R D E R %
01.09.2026
¶1Through the present writ petition the Petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs:- "a. to issue a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or directions, quashing the impugned Order-in-Original dated 5.6.2026, as no personal hearing was granted before passing the said order; b. to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or directions to the respondent to grant a personal hearing to the Petitioner and pass a de novo order; c. to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or directions to the respondent to pass a reasoned order on the time bar aspect;"
¶2Learned counsel representing the Petitioner submits that the opportunity of personal hearing was granted by the predecessor-in-office of the Authority which ultimately passed the order rejecting the refund application. Thus, the officer who passed the impugned order This is a digitally signed order. had not personally heard the Petitioner.
¶3Learned counsel representing the Respondent does not dispute the aforesaid position.
¶4Keeping in view the aforesaid admitted position, the order dated
05.06.2026 is set aside. The Competent Authority is directed to grant a fresh opportunity of personal hearing to the Petitioner on 07.09.2026 and thereafter, pass a fresh order, uninfluenced by the previous order dated 05.06.2026.
¶5The Competent Authority shall pass a reasoned order after considering the reply already filed by the Petitioner as well as any written submissions that may be filed by the Petitioner.
¶6With these observations, the present Writ Petition, along with pending applications, is disposed of.
ANIL KSHETARPAL, J.
SHAIL JAIN, J. SEPTEMBER 01, 2026/da/ad
This is a digitally signed order.
Case details
Parties and counsel
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010410162026 + W.P.(C) 12669/2026, CM APPL. 58868/2026, CM APPL. 58869/2026 and CM APPL. 58870/2026 M/S MAGNUS ANALYTICS .....Petitioner Through: Mr. R. Krishnan, Ms. Pankhuri Shrivastava, Mr. Atreya G C and Mr. Mukul, Advs. versus JOINT COMMISSIONER (Z-VIII) DEPT. OF TRADE AND TAXES, NEW DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sumit K. Batra, Panel Counsel GNCTD (Civil) and Ms. Priyanka Jindal, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHAIL JAIN (THROUGH VC)
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.