M/S Shubham Rice Mill and Ors. & Ors v. The State & Anr

O R D E R %

17.11.2025

¶1Written submissions have been filed by learned counsel for respondent no. 2. However, the same have not been filed by the learned counsel for the petitioners.

¶2No one was present on behalf of the petitioners, when the matter was taken up for hearing. On the last date of hearing also, no one had appeared on behalf of the petitioners.

¶3It seems that the petitioners are not interested in pursuing the present matter any further.

¶4Accordingly, the present petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution. This is a digitally signed order. 5. The stay granted vide order dated 15.11.2022 stands vacated.

¶6The order be uploaded on the website forthwith. DR. SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J NOVEMBER 17, 2025/zp TD This is a digitally signed order.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 5955/2022 M/S SHUBHAM RICE MILL AND ORS. .....Petitioners Through: None. versus THE STATE & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Naresh Kumar Chahar, APP for the State with Ms. Amisha Dahiya, Advocate Mr. Raveesh Thukral, Mr. G. Singh and Mr. John Mathew, Advocates for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMA