VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2026 › High Court of Delhi

Tata Capital Financial Service Ltd v. Emkor Solutions Ltd

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
19 August 2026
Bench
Om Prakash Shuklaauthor
Case no.
OMP (ENF.) (COMM.) 190/2019

Follow Delhi High CourtFollow Om Prakash Shukla

Judgment

O R D E R %

19.08.2026

¶1The learned Counsel appearing for the Judgment Debtor has submitted that the Decree Holder has already lodged his claim before the IRP/Liquidator.

¶2It is also borne from the record that there is lack of proof of adequate stamp duty deposited on arbitral award sought to be enforced.

¶3It is well settled that an insufficiently stamped instrument cannot be enforced. It equally settled that the aspect of stamp duty is a curable defect. However, this defect shall be cured in accordance with The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. the Indian Stamp Act, 18991.

¶4Section 33 of the Act imposes a duty upon this Court to impound an inadequately stamped instrument, i.e., arbitral award herein.

¶5This Court also issued practice directions dated 13.07.2026 in this respect, whereby Decree Holders seeking enforcement under Section 36 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act of 1996, were granted one last opportunity for four weeks to deposit sufficient stamp duty along with penalty, if any, on the arbitral award.

¶6The aforesaid period has concluded on 13.08.2026, hence no further indulgence can be granted.

¶7Accordingly, the award is liable to be impounded under Section 33 of the Act for the payment of sufficient stamp duty along with penalty, if applicable.

¶8In view of the above, the Decree Holder is directed to furnish the original award within four weeks from today.

¶9⁠List before the Joint Registrar for the needful on 07.09.2026.

¶10List this matter before this Court only after satisfying on the aspect of stamp duty along with penalty, if any.

1 As applicable in NCT of Delhi; "Act" hereinafter The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

¶11⁠Needless to state that if the arbitral award pertains to immovable property, the Decree Holder shall take appropriate steps to register the same in accordance with the Registration Act of 1908.

OM PRAKASH SHUKLA, J AUGUST 19, 2026/ss

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

Case details

Parties and counsel

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010431222019 + OMP (ENF.) (COMM.) 190/2019 TATA CAPITAL FINANCIAL SERVICE LTD .....Decree Holder Through: Mr. Savyasachi K. Sahai, Ms. Madhumita Bagchi and Mr. Rishabh Bagchi, Advs. versus EMKOR SOLUTIONS LTD .....Judgement Debtor Through: Ms. Anju Bhushan Gupta, Mr. Aditya Goel and Mr. Sanyam Gupta, Advocates for Liquidator of Judgment Debtor No. 2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLA

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.