VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2011 › High Court of Delhi

Sandeep v. State

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
18 November 2011
Bench
Mukta Guptaauthor
Case no.
BAIL APPLN. 383/2011

Judgment

ORDER %

18.11.2011 By this petition the Petitioners have sought bail in case FIR No. 62/2006 under Section 302/34 IPC registered at PS Bawana. The primary grievance of the Petitioners is that they are in custody since March and November,2006 respectivelyand there are as many as 83 witnessesto be examinedby the State out of which only 18 witnesseshave BAILAPPLN.1599/2009&383/2011 Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. been examined. A report was called from the learned District Judge-cum-learned AdditionalSessionJudge,Rohinito lookinto the matterand submita report regardingthe reasons for the delay in the Trial and also the feasibilityof transferring this matter to the Fast Track Court. A report has been received from the learned Trial Court stating that 14 witnesses have been examined by the Trial Court and there was no delay on its count, however, no further details have been given regarding the delay in trial. It is further stated that since the case pertain to the year 2006, it can be referred to Fast Track Court. Undoubtedly the Petitioners are in custody since 2006 and the trial has not progressed hence in such circumstances, this is a fit case to be transferred to the Fast Track Court. The learned Sessions Judge is thus directed to transfer the case to the Fast Track Court. Copy of the order be communicated to the learned District and Sessions Judge. Petitions are disposed of.

MUKTA GUPTA, J. NOVEMBER 18, 2011/'vn' BAILAPPLN.1599/2009&383/2011 ^ Page2 of2

Case details

Parties and counsel

62& 63# >1= IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 1599/2009 RAJESH @ IMRAN Petitioner Through: Mr. Ashutosh Bhardwaj, Advocate. versus STATE OF N.C.T. OF DELHI Respondent Through: Mr. Manoj Ohri, APP with ACP Subhash Tandon. AND + BAIL APPLN. 383/2011 SANDEEP Petitioner Through: Mr. Sumit Chaudhary, Advocate. versus STATE Respondent Through: Mi". Manoj Ohri, APP with ACP Subhash Tandon. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.