VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2023 › High Court of Delhi

Phonographic Performance Limited v. Sports and Leisure Apparel Limited & Ors

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
1 June 2023
Bench
C.Hari Shankarauthor
Case no.
CS(COMM) 853/2022

Judgment

O R D E R (O R A L) %

01.06.2023 I.A.11196/2023 (under Order XXIII Rule 3 of the CPC)

¶1The disputes between the parties stand settled and the present application has been jointly filed by them under Order XXIII Rule 3 of the CPC praying that the suit be decreed in terms of the said settlement. The terms of the settlement read thus: "i. That the Defendant No.1 has agreed to take a copyright license from the Plaintiff to use the Plaintiff's works in their stores which are currently operating as per the non refundable payment schedule annexed to the present application and marked as DOCUMENT - 1.

ii. The Defendant No. 1 accepts that the license fee being paid by it is only for the purpose of usage of the Plaintiff's copyrighted works as background music in its stores and in case the Defendant No. 1 wishes to organize an event in any of its premises and utilize the Plaintiff's works, it will take a separate event license for the same.

iii. In view of the aforesaid, the Plaintiff agrees to forgo the reliefs of damages and costs as claimed in Prayers (ii), and (iii) of the Plaint.

Signed By:KAMLA RAWAT

CS(COMM) 853/2022

¶4That the parties have agreed that the present suit being CS

(COMM) No. 853 of 2022 before this Hon'ble Court be decreed in the aforesaid terms. Further, it is agreed between the parties that all disputes and differences arising out of this Suit stands settled conclusively in terms of paragraph 3 above.

¶5That on the basis of the representation made by the Defendant No.1 that Defendant Nos. 2 to 8 have no direct correlation with the present lis, the Plaintiff agrees to not claim any relief against the said Defendants in the present matter."

¶2In view of the aforesaid terms of settlement, no dispute survives for consideration in the present suit. Learned Counsel are present on behalf of their respective clients. They undertake on their behalf to remain bound by the terms of settlement.

¶3The Court has perused the terms of settlement and finds them to be lawful and enforceable.

¶4As such, the suit stands decreed in terms of the aforesaid terms of settlement arrived arrived at between the parties by which the parties shall remain bound.

¶5The plaintiff would be entitled to refund of court fees, if any, deposited by it.

¶6The next date of hearing fixed in the matter stands cancelled.

C.HARI SHANKAR, J

JUNE 1, 2023/kr

Signed By:KAMLA RAWAT

Case details

Parties and counsel

CS(COMM) 853/2022 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(COMM) 853/2022 PHONOGRAPHIC PERFORMANCE LIMITED ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Ankur Sangal and Mr.Raghu Vinayak Sinha, Advs. versus SPORTS AND LEISURE APPAREL LIMITED & ORS. ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Rohan Rohatgi, Adv. for D-1 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.