VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2024 › High Court of Delhi

Sh Davinder Kumar & Ors v. State NCT of Delhi & Ors

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
18 November 2024
Bench
Dinesh Kumar Sharmaauthor
Case no.
CRL.M.C. 5929/2024

Judgment

O R D E R %

18.11.2024

¶1The present petition has been filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for quashing of FIR No. 0218/2024 registered under Sections 308/323/341/506/34 IPC at Police Station Maidan Garhi, District South, New Delhi, and all the other proceedings emanating therefrom.

¶2The FIR in question was lodged on the statement made by respondent No.2. The cross FIR bearing No. 0219/2024 was lodged on the statement made by petitioner No.1 herein, pertains to the same incident, which were registered on 13.05.2024.

¶3Predominantly, the cause of the dispute was the installation of the water connection. Both parties are related to each other and are The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. neighbours also. Now, they have entered into the settlement on the following terms and conditions:- "1. The both the Parties agrees to withdraw/quash the FIR No.218/2024, u/s 308/323/341/506/34 IPC and FIR No. 219/2014, u/s 325/323/341/506/34 IPC registered in Police station Maidan Garhi against each other, both the parties give their consent and agrees to cooperate in the quashing of both the FIR registered against each other.

¶2That both the parties undertake not to file any further complaints/cases against each other or against their family members regarding the dispute arise from the alleged incident dated 12.4.2024.

¶3That both the parties have mutually agreed that they shall not institute, file and proceed with any fresh or complaint, litigation either civil or criminal nature against each other in future and with draw all the cases and complaints filed by both the parties after execution of present deed.

¶4That now both the parties have no grievances of any nature against each other."

¶4The minors have been represented by their natural guardians. No other criminal case is pending against the petitioners. Both the parties are present in Court and have duly been identified by the Investigation Officer. Respondents No. 2 and 3 submit that they have entered into the settlement voluntarily without any fear, force, or coercion.

¶5The High Court is the highest court of the State and is conferred with the power of control and superintendence over all courts subordinate to it. Besides Articles 226 and 227, Section 482 CrPC also acknowledges the inherent power of the high court to secure the ends of justice. In cases where the offences are not compoundable in nature, the parties on account of an amicable settlement invoke the inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing the The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. proceedings on the plea that continuance thereof would merely be an abuse of process of law.

¶6The Courts have repeatedly held that if the dispute is private in nature and parties have entered into the settlement at their own free will, the quashing of the proceedings may be done. However, the Courts have to satisfy themselves that the settlement so entered into is within the four corners of the law.

¶7In the case of Narinder Singh & Ors. V. State of Punjab & Anr.

(2014) 6 SCC 466, it was inter-alia held that criminal cases having overwhelmingly and predominantly of civil character should be quashed when the parties have resolved their entire disputes among themselves. Therefore, in the present case, predominantly, it is a private dispute and the parties have settled the matter.

¶8Taking into account the totality of facts and circumstances of the case, this Court considers that the parties have entered into an amicable settlement out of their own free will, without any fear, force or coercion and they should be given an opportunity to lead their lives peacefully. No purpose will be served in continuing with the trial.

¶9In view of the above, FIR No. 0218/2024 registered under Sections 308/323/341/506/34 IPC at Police Station Maidan Garhi, District South, New Delhi and all the other proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.

¶10The present petition stands disposed of.

DINESH KUMAR SHARMA, J NOVEMBER 18, 2024/Dy/ht.. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

Case details

Parties and counsel

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 5929/2024 SH DAVINDER KUMAR & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr.Naveen Kumar, Mr.Kunal Rexwal and Mr.Anshul Garg, Advocates alongwith petitioners versus STATE NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms.Kiran Bairwa, APP for the State Mr.Aayushman Shukla, Advocate for R-2 (Through VC) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SHARMA

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.