Sumer Chand Aggarwal v. Lokesh Chandra Sharma

%23.09.2010 . Present: Mr.Vinay Gupta, Adv. for the petitioner. Mr.Siddhanth Bambha, Adv. for the respondent. J RCR No.85i2010 & CM No. 6905/2010 (stav) Petitioner in terms of order dated 5tl' August,2010 has furnished the undertaking. Learned counsel for respondent states that the underlaking is in order. : Learned counsel for petitioner also states that if during the period , of undertaking, petitioner expires then his legal representative shall have no right to stay in the premises in question after l't May,20l2. Accordingly, the undertaking fuinished by petitioner is hereby accepted. Petitioner is granted time till 1" May, 2012 to vacate the premises in question Petitioner shall be bound by the terms of undertaking. The eviction order shall not be executable till I't May,2012 In case of violation of the terms of undertaking, eviction order si shall become executable forthwith. _--'t Present petition and application stand disposed of accordingly. Dasti. _Fs v.B. GUPTA, J. SEPTEMBER 23,2O1O 'ns' Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing.