Ram Kumar v. State & Anr

ORDER

04.11.2011 The petitioner and respondent No.2 are present in person along with their counsel. Both the parties are identified by their respective Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. counsel. These are two cross cases arise out of different FIRs bearing NO.613/2010 and 614/2010 registered at P.S. Shahdara, Delhi. Both the complainants and the accused in their respective cases have arrived at an amicable settlement. Both the complainants are making statements that since they have settled their disputes , no useful purpose will be served in continuing with the criminal proceedings arising out of aforesaid FIRs. Consequently both the FIRs NO.613/2010 and 614/2010 registered against the petitioners at P.5. Shahdara and the proceedings arising therefrom are quashed. The petitions are disposed of. M.L. MEHTA,J NOVEMBER 04,2011 skw

$-6 & 7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 1024/2011 ARUN SHARMA Through: .... Petitioner Mr. J.5. Kanwar, Advocate along with petitioner in person. versus STATE & ANR ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Jasbir Kaur, APP for the State. Mr. Lalit Kumar, Advocate for respondent No.2 along with respondent No.2 in person. AND + CRL.M.C. 1029/2011 RAM KUMAR ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Lalit Kumar, Advocate along with petitioner in person. versus STATE & ANR ..". Respondent Through: Ms. Jasbir Kaur, APP for the State. Mr. J.S. Kanwar, Advocate, for respondent No.2 along with respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.L. MEHTA