VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2011 › High Court of Delhi

Naresh Mehta & Ors v. State & Ors

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
25 November 2011
Bench
Mukta Guptaauthor
Case no.
CRL.M.C. 1044/2011

Judgment

ORDER

25.11.2011 This is a petition for quashing of FIR No. 752/2007 under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC registered at PS Model Town, New Delhi on the complaint of Respondent No.2. The complainant/Respondent No. 2 Smt. Shruti is present in person and is identified by her counsel. She states that the Petitioners and r:- ' '-' I r-·-- '-.._/ ,.·, Respondent No.2/Complainant have entered into a Compromise. In terms of the settlement, marriage between the Petitioner No. 1 and Respondent No. 2/complainant has been dissolved by a decree of divorce by mutual consent. '. As part of full and final settlement of all the claims of the Respondent No. 2, I the Petitioner No. 1 has paid out of which have already been paid to her and remaining amount have been paid '-'< I I ;:-( Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. in cash in Court Today. She further states that in view of the se between the parties, she does not want to pursue the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. In view of the fact that the parties have amicably resolved their differences of their own free will, volition and without any coercion and no useful purpose will be served in continuance of the proceedings, rather the same would create further acrimony between them, it would be in the interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. There is no legal impediment in quashing the FIR in question. Consequently, 752/2007 under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC registered at PS Model Town, New Delhi and proceedings pursuant thereto are hereby quashed. .':;·- Parties have signed this order sheet in acknowledgment of their statements made before this Court. The petition and the pending application are disposed of. Order dasti. {'P-:?if NOVEMBER 25, 2011 .. :t.· 'dk' U V"'"J Pt. . \J'(/ ,, J ' w I I' ' ' I rc ' 'p ,;-! :: I i: T. / l?lj, 'rh't:rvl.o 0 1'\0 , , 4o . . " ....\1 1-'"" .... \ g \,\ ').. . r ·''s \) p,sJ. \} D '3 -:rtlu f '2.4:) 1 o [5:-·y-i:

Case details

Parties and counsel

@ * + 0/o IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 1044/2011 & Crl. M.A. No. 3876/2011(Stay) NARESH l\1EHT A & ORS ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Arvind Kumar & Mr. Rahul Mangla, Advocate with Petitioners in person. versus STATE & ORS ..... Respondent CORAM: Through Mr. Manoj Ohri APP for the State. Mr. Vikas Sharma, Advocate with Respondent No.2 in person. HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.