Customs Through Roshan Lal A.C.C v. Aibini Ansar Ismail

ORDER

22.L1.2011 This is a leave to appeal filed by the petitioner against the judgment dated 11.10.2010 acquitting the accused for an offence u/s t32/135 (1)(a) of the Customs Act' The learned counsel for the petitioner has not been able to make out any ground for grant of leave to appeal against the impugned order. I have gone through the impugned order, it is reasoned and speaking order justifying the acquittal of the respondent. The reason for acquittal handed down by the Court is that the appellants have not been able to prove the sanction for prosecution of the respondent. The learned counsel had sought adjournment to show the case law that even the statement of the witness who has not been made available for o/o

1.

2.

¶3f-' \- t' Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. T cross examination to a party can be relied upon, obviously, he could not produce anyi as there would be none. No ground for grant of leave to appeal is made out, accordingly the petition is dismissed. -llAA,adL /\t v.K. sHALr, J NOVEMBER 22, ZOLI/mr ,L

't $-5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT + cRL. L.P . 2L9 l2OLL CUSTOMS THROUGH: ROSHAN LAL A.C.C. NEW DELHI ..... Petitioner Advocate .+. Through: Mr.G.S.Kanojia, VCTSUS AIBINI ANSAR ISMAIL ..... RCSPONdCNT Through: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V'K. SHALI