VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2025 › High Court of Delhi

Jaivati & Ors v. Santosh Kumar Yadav & Ors

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
11 November 2025
Bench
Amit Sharmaauthor
Case no.
CONT.CAS(C) 1161/2025

Follow Delhi High CourtFollow Amit Sharma

Judgment

O R D E R %

11.11.2025

¶1This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.

¶2Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent no. 1 has handed up in Court today a copy of the compliance affidavit dated 11.08.2025, authored by Arvind Kumar, Project Director, PIU Ghaziabad, and the same has been taken on record. In the said compliance affidavit it has been stated as under: - <5. An encroachment removal drive was conducted on

04.08.2025, during which, with the assistance of the District Administration, NHAI'S Concessionaire successfully removed all encroachments. Photographs evidencing the same are annexed hereto and marked as Annexure R-2/2. Letter dated 11.08.2025 of the Concessionaire, evidencing that the encroachments has been removed is also annexed and marked as Annexure R-2/3."

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

¶3Relevant photographs have also been placed on record, which are reproduced herein as under: -

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

¶4Respondent no. 2 has also handed up in Court today a communication dated 11.08.2025, authored by Prashant Kumar Singh, Project Head, and the same has been taken on record. The said communication also confirms that encroachment removal had been done on 04.08.2025.

¶5In these circumstances, no further directions are called for.

¶6Needless to state that respondents shall ensure that no further encroachment be made at the subject property.

¶7Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the construction is still on-going, however, nothing has been placed on record to show the same.

¶8In case of any future encroachment, the petitioner shall be at liberty to revive the present petition.

¶9The present petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

AMIT SHARMA, J NOVEMBER 11, 2025/kr/db

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

Case details

Parties and counsel

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CONT.CAS(C) 1161/2025 JAIVATI & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Ajay Harshana, Adv. through Vc. versus SANTOSH KUMAR YADAV & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Santosh Kumar, SC with Mr. Devansh Malhotra, Adv. For R-1. Mr. Aman Naqvi, Mr. Shashank Kapoor, Mr. Harshit Anand, Mr. Ashish Kr. Pandey, Advs. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMA

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.