VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2025 › High Court of Delhi

Ms.Mishra Sports Wear, v. Sh Vipin Preenja & Anr

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
18 November 2025
Bench
Manmeet Pritam Singh Aroraauthor
Case no.
C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM) 431/2022

Judgment

O R D E R %

18.11.2025

¶1Learned counsels for the parties' state that parties have entered into a settlement agreement dated 18.09.2025, whereby they have mutually resolved their disputes with respect to the use of the subject mark 'MAREX'.

¶2Learned counsel for the respondent no. 1 states that Mr. Vipin Preenja/Respondent No. 1 has joined the proceedings through video conferencing link and is identified by him.

¶3Learned counsel for the respondent no. 1 states that respondent no. 1 shall remain bound by the terms of settlement agreement and shall not interfere with the Petitioner's use of subject mark 'MAREX' in terms of settlement agreement.

¶4Similarly, learned counsel for the petitioner states that petitioner as This is a digitally signed order. well, will use the subject mark 'MAREX' strictly as per the terms and conditions of the settlement agreement. He states that the settlement agreement has been filed vide e-diary no. 7973518/2025 and prays that the said settlement agreement may be taken on record.

¶5It is stated that in view of the said settlement, the petitioner has agreed to withdraw the present petition.

¶6This Court has perused the terms of settlement agreement.

¶7In view of the aforesaid submission of the parties, the petition is disposed of as withdrawn, in terms of the settlement agreement dated

18.09.2025 binding the parties to the said agreement.

¶8The Petitioner is directed to remove the objection and bring the settlement agreement filed vide e-diary no. 7973518/2025 on record.

¶9All future dates stand cancelled.

¶10The digitally signed copy of this order, duly uploaded on the official website of the Delhi High Court, www.delhihighcourt.nic.in, shall be treated as a certified copy of the order for the purpose of ensuring compliance. No physical copy of order shall be insisted by any authority/entity or litigant.

MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J NOVEMBER 18, 2025/hp

This is a digitally signed order.

Case details

Parties and counsel

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM) 431/2022 MS. MISHRA SPORTS WEAR, .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Y.S Tyagi, Adv. versus SH VIPIN PREENJA & ANR .....Respondent Through: Mr. Shashank Pandey, Adv. for R-1 Mr. Mukul Singh, CGSC with Mr Aryan Dhaka, Advs. for R-2 Mr. Vipin Preenja, R-1 (Through VC) CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.