Gurdial Sharma & Anr v. State

ORDER %

17.11.2011 The counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that a sum of Rs.21086/- which was a demand as per provisional bill dated

23.3.1999 has been already deposited by the petitioner. The counsel for the NDPL says that the NDPL is not in possession of the record of its erstwhile predecessor DVB. The same is endorsed by the affidavit of Mr.Kulvinder Singh, working Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. as HOG-FACG with NDPL. There is no reason to disbeheve counsel for the petitioners and also the bill a copy of which is placed on record. In view of the above, the counsel for the respondent has no objection for passing appropriate order. In view of the above, consequently, the FIR bearing No. 156/1999 under Section I.E.Act r/w Section 379 IPG registered at PS Kirti Nagar stands quashed. NOVEMBER 17,2011 sv L. MEHTA,J

$-16 * IN THE fflGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 1213/2011 GURDIAL SHARMA & ANR. Petitioners Through: Mr.R.K.Tewari, Advocate versus STATE Respondents Through: Ms.Fizani Hussain, APP Mr.Vishva Wadhwa, Adv ForNDPL CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.L. MEHTA