Syed Mohammad Matloob v. Gyanesh Bharti & Ors

O R D E R %

12.11.2024

¶1The present petition is taken up on oral mentioning made by the petitioner himself.

¶2This matter was, otherwise, listed yesterday and was adjourned to

31.03.2025.

¶3The petitioner has sought initiation of contempt proceedings for violation of judgement dated 20.03.2023 passed in W.P.(C) 5354/2022, as according to him, the MCD had not carried out any action for the illegal and This is a digitally signed order. CONT.CAS(C) 1911/2023 2

un-authorised construction in the property in question situated in Jamia Nagar, Okhla, New Delhi.

¶4However, the petitioner has informed that in terms of the directions given by the Hon'ble Supreme Court, the above said building has already been demolished and, therefore, nothing survives in the present contempt petition.

¶5In view of the statement made by the petitioner in person, the petition is disposed of as not pressed.

¶6The next date stands cancelled.

MANOJ JAIN, J

NOVEMBER 12, 2024/sw

This is a digitally signed order.

CONT.CAS(C) 1911/2023 1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CONT.CAS(C) 1911/2023 SYED MOHAMMAD MATLOOB .....Petitioner Through: Petitioner in person. versus GYANESH BHARTI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Rashmi Chopra, Advocate for DDA. Mr. Sushil Raja, SPC for UOI Mr. Abhinav Singh with Mr. Praveen Kaushik and Mr. Shaurya Verma, Advocates for Delhi Police with ASI Vikendra and SI Pardeep Malik, PS Jamia Nagar. Mr. Rakesh Kumar with Mr. Sunil, Advocates for MCD. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN