VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2016 › High Court of Delhi

Laxman Kumar Sagar v. Vinod Kumar

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
1 February 2016
Bench
Joint Registrar (Judicial) Sh. Ashutosh Kumar (Dhjs)author
Case no.
CS(OS) 769/2013

Judgment

O R D E R %

01.02.2016 I.A. No.18430/2015 under Order VI Rule 17 r/w Section 151 CPC moved on behalf of plaintiff seeking amendment of plaint

Learned counsel for defendant has submitted that reply to the captioned IA shall be filed within one week and advance copy of the same be supplied to learned counsel for plaintiff. Learned counsel for plaintiff has submitted that thereafter he shall file rejoinder to the same within one week. CS(OS) 769/2013

Learned counsels for parties have admitted that vide order dated

03.07.2015 in FAO(OS) 326/2015, the Hon'ble Division Bench has directed for deferring the hearing in the suit but no restraint order for not transferring the present matter to concerned district court having pecuniary and territorial jurisdiction, has been passed. In view of notification no.27187/DHC/Orgl. Dated 24.11.2015, the present matter stands transferred. Parties are directed to appear before the Court of Ld. District Judge, South East District, Saket Court Complex, Delhi on 15.07.2016 at 10.00 a.m. However this would be subject to any directions in FAO(OS) 326/2015.

ASHUTOSH KUMAR (DHJS)

JOINT REGISTRAR (JUDICIAL) FEBRUARY 01, 2016/ab

Case details

Parties and counsel

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 769/2013 LAXMAN KUMAR SAGAR ..... Plaintiff Through Mr. Rishabh Kumar, Adv. versus VINOD KUMAR ..... Defendant Through Mr. Himanshu Pathak, Adv. CORAM: ASHUTOSH KUMAR (DHJS), JOINT REGISTRAR (JUDICIAL)

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.