- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 11 November 2016
- Bench
- Vibhu Bakhru
- Case no.
- EX.P. 102/2006
Judgment
O R D E R %
11.11.2016 EX.APPL.(OS) Nos.125/2015, 285/2011, 151/2012, 127/2011, 288/2011, 207/2014 and 287/2011in EX.P.-102/2006 None appears for the Decree Holder. The learned counsel for the Judgement Debtor refers to an order dated
13.01.2016 passed by a Division Bench of this Court in EFA(OS)9/2015, whereby it was held that the present execution cannot continue without the permission of the concerned Company Court. No such permission appears to have been taken; at any rate nothing has been filed before this Court to indicate to the contrary. It is further stated that Decree Holder has expired. On the last date of hearing - 29.09.2016 - the learned counsel for the Decree Holder had sought time to ascertain whether the Decree Holder has expired. Since none is present on behalf of Decree Holder, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. The Decree Holder would be at liberty to apply afresh after obtaining necessary permission from the Company Court. VIBHU BAKHRU, J NOVEMBER 11, 2016 RK
Case details
Parties and counsel
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + EX.P. 102/2006 MR.URI JUSTMAN ..... Decree Holder Through: None. versus M/S TELEPHONE CABLE LTD ..... Judgement Debtor Through: Mr Arjun Dewan and Ms Anupama Kumar, Advocates. Mr Siddharth Mittal and Mr Anupam Yadav for Official Liquidator. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.