- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 11 November 2024
- Bench
- Anish Dayal
- Case no.
- CRL.M.C. 7179/2024
Judgment
O R D E R %
11.11.2024
¶1This petition has been filed setting aside the order dated 12th July, 2024 by which application the application under Section 311 Cr.P.C. was dismissed by the JMFC (NI-Act)-01, South East, Saket Courts, New Delhi.
¶2In the impugned order, it is noted that they sought to examine the Authorised Representative ('AR'), who was substituted post the assignment of the death of the complainant, to the new company. The new AR was Nirmal Singh, who was substituted on 21st June, 2023, only to represent the complainant. His evidence was not filed and he was never examined, hence, the question of examining him, did not arise. The assignment of debt would be considered, as an operation of law.
¶3The impugned order has rightly dismissed the application filed under Section 311 Cr.P.C. It is rightly noted that the trial was at the stage of final arguments, and the said application was filed only to delay the proceedings.
¶4The petition is dismissed. Pending applications also stands disposed This is a digitally signed order. of as infructuous.
¶5Order be uploaded on the website of this Court. ANISH DAYAL, J NOVEMBER 11, 2024 DU This is a digitally signed order.
Case details
Parties and counsel
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 7179/2024 & CRL.M.A. Nos. 27411-12/2024 SAMRIDH SHARMA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Chandan Bhatia, Advocate. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Digam Singh Dagar, APP for State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYAL
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.