Reshma v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors

O R D E R %

18.08.2026

¶1The petitioner's husband has been declared as a bad character. In order to keep a vigil on the petitioner's husband, certain steps are required to be taken.

¶2It is submitted that there are 32 criminal antecedents against the husband of the petitioner.

¶3The Court thus finds that the husband of the petitioner has to challenge the order of declaring him as a bad character, if he so desires.

¶4Even otherwise, it is contended by the respondents that there is no breach of the petitioner's fundamental rights and no specific instances have This is a digitally signed order. been shown against the respondents in order to establish the violation of fundamental right.

¶5The steps which are required to be taken by the respondents pursuant to the husband of the petitioner having been declared as a bad character are being undertaken strictly in accordance with law.

¶6In view of the aforesaid, no interference is called for at this stage.

¶7With these observations, the petition stands dismissed. PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J AUGUST 18, 2026 ab This is a digitally signed order.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010607372025 + W.P.(CRL) 2653/2025 RESHMA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Bipin Kumar Jha, Adv. versus STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Rahul Tyagi, ASC (CRL) Mr. Sangeet Sibou, Ms. Priya Rai, Mr. Avinash Kumar Singh, Mr. Priyansh Raj Singh, Advs. for State. SI Arvind Kr. P.S. Jafrabad. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV