- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 21 May 2013
- Bench
- J.R. Midha
- Case no.
- O.M.P. 456/2013
Follow Delhi High CourtFollow J.R. Midha
Judgment
ORDER %
21.05.2013
¶1This case was kept pendingwith respectto the objectionof Amit Kapoor to para 4 of the affidavitof Prem Pal Kathuria in whichKathuriahas undertakento depositthe TDS ofRs.3,37,250/- within 15 days and to give TDS certificateto Amit Kapoor in /i respectofthe same. The apprehensionofMr. AmitKapooris that he may not get the benefitof the TDS certificatefor the financial years 2010-11 and 2011-12. Mi*. Sanjeev Sabharwal,the learned StandingCounsel for Income Tax Departmentis presentin Court and he submits that Mr. Amit Kapoor will have to file revised return to get the benefitof the TDS depositedby Mr. Prem Pal Kathuria. In that view ofthe matter,the objectionofAmitKapoor to para4ofthe affidavitis not sustainable.
¶2The learnedcounsel for Mr. Amit Kapoor submitsthat Mr. PremPal Kathuriashouldmentionthe financialyear2011-12while depositingthe TDS to whichthe learnedcounselfor Mr. Prem Pal Kathuria has no objection.
¶3Both the partieshave filed their respectiveundertakingsby way ofaffidavitin termsofthe orderdated 14^^May, 2013.
¶4The undertakingsofboththe partiesare accepted.
¶5Boththe petitionsare disposedofin terms ofthe orderdated 14^'' May, 2013 and the undertakingsgiven by them. Both the partiesshallremainboundby the undertakinggivenby themto this Court.
¶6Copyofthis orderbe givendasti. MAY 21, 2013 aj J.R. MIDHA, J /!
Case details
Parties and counsel
40&41 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P. 172/2013 AMIT KAPOOR Petitioner Through : Ms. Manmeet Arora, Adv. versus M/S PACIFIC EDUCATIONAL ACADEMY ... Respondent Through : Mr. Sarvendra Singh and Mr. Rajesh Pathak, Advs. + O.M.P. 456/2013 and I.A.No.7359/2013 M/S PACIFIC EDUCATIONAL ACADEMY .... Petitioner Through : Mr. Sarvendra Singh and Mr. Rajesh Pathak, Advs. versus , AMIT KAPOOR Respondent Through: Ms. ManmeetArora,Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.