- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 2 November 2011
- Bench
- V.K. Shali
- Case no.
- CRL.M.C. 1351/2011
Follow Delhi High CourtFollow V.K. Shali
Judgment
ORDER o2.t1.2011 By virtue of the present petition the petitioners have challenged the order dated 10.11.2010 whereby the learned trial Court had directed issuance of process u/s B2 Cr. P.C. against the petitioners as they had failed to respond to various processes issued against them as well as order dated 11.03.20tL whereby the petitioners have been declared as proclaimed offenders. I do not find any infirmity in the order dated 11.03.20Lt by virtue of which the petitioners were declared proclaimed offenders nor there are any grounds which will warrant the quashing of the complaint. If the petitioners does not appear despite service of summons, the learned Magistrate has no other method to procure their attendance except by d
¶2Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. b 4r+-+t 't ,l 'vi-t seeking issuance of coercive processes which precisely he has done in the instant case.
¶3Accordingly, the present petition is witliout any merit and is dismissed. v.K. sHALr, J NOVEMBER 02, ztitt mr grr I
Case details
Parties and counsel
\ ri o/o 1. $-51 & 52 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + cRL.M.C. 135I/20r1, CRL.M.C. 1352/20rr KRISHAN KUMAR AGARWAL & ORS ..... Petitioners Through: Ms. Anjna Masih, Advocate along with petitioner No.1. versus STATE & ANR ..... Respondent Mr.Navin Sharma, APP Through: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALI
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.