- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 7 November 2024
- Bench
- Girish Kathpalia
- Case no.
- RFA 645/2024
Follow Delhi High CourtFollow Girish Kathpalia
Judgment
O R D E R %
07.11.2024 [Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request)] CM APPL. 65124/2024 (exemption)
¶1Allowed, subject to all just exceptions CM APPL. 65123/2024 (early hearing)
¶2For the reasons mentioned therein, the application is allowed and hearing is preponed to this day. The date of 02.12.2024 fixed earlier stands cancelled. RFA 645/2024
¶3The appellant has assailed judgment and decree of the learned Trial Court under Order XII Rule 6 CPC, thereby directing restoration of possession of the tenanted property to the present respondent landlord. By way of the impugned judgment, the learned Trial Court also dismissed the application of the present appellant under Section 10 CPC. The power under Order XII Rule 6 CPC was invoked by the learned Trial Court in view of This is a digitally signed order. clear admission of all three necessary ingredients, viz. admission of relationship of tenancy between the parties, rate of rent being above the statutory protection of the Delhi Rent Control Act and service of quit notice.
¶4After addressing partly, learned counsel for appellant on instructions of her client seeks permission to withdraw this appeal with protection against the impugned judgment and decree for a period of only two months from today.
¶5Considering these circumstances, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn, making it clear that operation of impugned judgment and decree shall remain stayed till 07.01.2025 and the appellant shall vacate the subject property on or before 07.01.2025. But it is also made clear that if the appellant does not vacate the subject property by 07.01.2025, the respondent shall be at liberty to proceed with execution of the impugned judgment and decree.
¶6A copy of this order be sent to the learned Trial Court for information.
GIRISH KATHPALIA, J NOVEMBER 7, 2024/as
Click here to check corrigendum, if any This is a digitally signed order.
Case details
Parties and counsel
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CM APPL. 65123/2024 & CM APPL. 65124/2024 in + RFA 645/2024 ABHAY VOHRA .....Appellant Through: Ms. Shikha Sagar, Advocate versus SADHNA GOYAL .....Respondent Through: None CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.