- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 25 November 2011
- Bench
- Sunil Gaur
- Case no.
- W.P.(C) 3609/2011
Judgment
ORDER 2s.tl.20tl The grievance of the petitioner is that despite the rejection of Revision Petition of Ghasi Pura Extension colony residents on 9'l' November,2010, fresh warrants of possession have not been issued by the SDM Najafgarh, Delhi, although, prior to the order of 9th November, 2010, wamants of possession of 8th January, 2008, (Annexure-B) were issued. In paragraph No.9 of this petition it is stated that the petitioner had filed various representations before the concerned officials, but the decree in favour of the petitioner is not being implemented. Copy of no such representation has been filed along with the writ petition. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he can do so. The appropriate course in a matter like this, would be to permit the petitioner to make a fresh representation to the SDM Najafgarh, Delhi, giving entire factual details and oh
1.
2.
¶3WP[C) No.3609/2011 Page 1 Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. a-=
4.
¶5to seek fresh warrants of possession, like the one as Annexure-B. Learngd counsel for the petitioner states that the requisite representation would be made to SDM Najafgarh, Delhi, within a week. As an when any such representation is received from the petitioner, the concer:ned SDM is directed to deal with it in accordance with the law and to pass a speaking order thereon within a period of four weeks and to communicate the fate of this representation to the petitioner within two weeks thereafter. With directions, as aforesaid, this petition is disposed of. No costs. copy of the order be given dasti to counsel for both the sides. NOVEMBER 25,2OII n
6.
7.
¶8IL GAUR, J wPICJ No.3609/2011 Page2
Case details
Parties and counsel
- s-l8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + w.P.(c) 3609t20rr ITAJWATI ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. N.S. Dalal and Mr. Suman Chaudhary, Advocates. versus GNCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. V.K. Tandon, Advocate. T CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.