- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 7 November 2024
- Bench
- Anish Dayal
- Case no.
- W.P.(CRL) 3019/2024
Follow Delhi High CourtFollow Anish Dayal
Judgment
O R D E R %
07.11.2024
¶1Counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw this petition, because, the charge-sheet has already been filed and they wish to take the pleas at the stage of framing of charge.
¶2Counsel for the petitioner has submitted that even prima facie the charges cannot be made out. He is at liberty to take all his pleas at the stage of framing of charge.
¶3The petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Liberty is granted to the petitioner, as prayed for above.
¶4It is made clear that this Court has not undertaken and assessment on the merits of the matter and all pleas are open to the petitioner, to assert before This is a digitally signed order. the Trial Court.
¶5It is stated that in the event, supplementary charge-sheet related to the FSL Reports, etc. are not filed for a prolonged period, the petitioner is at liberty to reagitate this matter before the Court.
¶6Order be uploaded on the website of this Court. ANISH DAYAL, J NOVEMBER 7, 2024/RK Click here to check corrigendum, if any This is a digitally signed order.
Case details
Parties and counsel
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 3019/2024 BISWA BANDAN MOHANTY .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Bishwjeet Kumar Patna with Ms. Kiran Yadav, Mr. Amjad Malik, Mr. Anish Aalam, Ms. Hemlata, Advocates. versus STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, Standing Counsel(GL), with Mr. Abhinav Kr. Arya, Advocate with SI Shetal, PS. K.M Pur. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYAL
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.