- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 11 November 2011
- Bench
- Mukta Gupta
- Case no.
- W.P.(CRL) 1534/2011
Follow Delhi High CourtFollow Mukta Gupta
Judgment
ORDER ll.1l.20ll Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. Crl.M.A. 17666/201 1 (delay) For the reasons stated in the application the delay of 139 days in re-filing is condoned. w.P.(cRL) 1s34l2011 By this petition the Petitioner seeks registration of FIR and directions to arrest the Respondent Nos. 4 to 8. In view of the decisions of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Gangadhar Janardan Mhatre vs. State of Maharashtra and Ors.,2004 (7) SCC 768, Minu Kumari & Anr. v/s State of Bihar & Ors
(2006) 4 SCC 359 and Aleque Padamsee & Ors v/s UOI & Ors, 2007 (6) w.P.(cRL) 1s34/2011 SCC 17I , since an alternate remedy is available to the Petitioner, the present petition is not maintainable. Petition is disposed of. However, the Petitioner would be at liberfy to file a complaint case in case anv offence is made out before the Learned Trial Court. NOVEMBER II"2OII 'gat M- 'MUKTA GUPTA,J w.P.(cRL) 1ss4/2011
Case details
Parties and counsel
i;:> t', $-68 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P:(CRL) Is34l20Ir RANBIR SINGH Through ..... Petitioner Mr. Pushpender Singh Dahiya, Adv. .I versus COMMISSIONER OF POLICE &. ORS ..... Respondent Through Mr. Dayan Krishnan, ASC for State with SI Madan, PS Begumpur. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA Vo Crl.M.A. 1766sl20lI
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.