- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 23 May 2013
- Bench
- Manmohan Singh
- Case no.
- ARB.P. 193/2013
Follow Delhi High CourtFollow Manmohan Singh
Judgment
ORDER %
23.05.2013 Respondents ai'e served. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent No.2 states that the said respondent is not a necessary paity. Learned counsel for the petitioner has no objection if the name of respondent No.2 is deleted from the aiTay of the parties. Ordered accordingly. Let the amended memo of parties be filed by the petitioner within one week. Learned counsel appealing on behalf of respondent No.l states that his clienthas no objectionif the prayermade in this petition is allowedand a sole independent Aibitiator be appointedby this Court. With the consent of the parties, Mr.Amit George, Advocate (Mob.No.9910524364),who is also present in Court, is appointedas sole Aibitiator to adjudicate upon all the disputes and differences between the parties, as mentionedin this petition. The paities shall appear before the Signed By:RAM DATT Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Albitratoron 9"' July, 2013 at 2.30 p.m. The Arbiti'atorshall conductthe proceedingsunder the provisionsof the Ai'bitiationand ConciliationAct, 1996. The fee of the Ai'bitrator is fixed at ?80,000/- which shall be paid by both the patties in equalproportion. The petition is accordinglydisposedof Copies of this order be given dasti to the learned counsel for the paities. A copyof the samebe also communicatedto the leamedArbitiator. MAY 23,2013/ka
Case details
Parties and counsel
$-22 * EN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ARB.P. 193/2013 M/S BUDHIRAJA ELECTRICALS Petitioner Thi'ough Mi'.Sanjoy Bhaumik, Adv. versus FARMER'S COOPERATIVE GROUP HOUSING SOCIETY LTD & ANR Respondents Through Mi-.Ashok Chhabra, Adv. for R-1. Mi'.Bhupesh Naiula, Adv. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.