Jeet Ahuja & Ors v. Kartik Girdhar

O R D E R %

13.11.2025

¶1Learned counsel for the respondent/ landlord appearing through video conferencing submits that pursuant to the order dated 17.09.2025 passed by this Court, the respondent/ landlord has received the vacant, peaceful and physical possession of the subject premises.

¶2Considering the aforesaid, learned counsel for the respondent/ landlord submits that he shall not press for the user and occupation charges fixed vide aforesaid order dated 17.09.2025.

¶5As such, in view of the judgment passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in N.C. Daga vs. Inder Mohan Singh Rana [2003(1) SCC 453] and Vinod Kumar Verma vs. Manmohan Verma & Anr. [Civil Appeal Nos.5220-5221 of 2008, order dated 19.08.2008], the present petition has become infructuous as there is nothing remaining therein.

¶3Accordingly, the present petition, alongwith the pending This is a digitally signed order. application, stand disposed of.

SAURABH BANERJEE, J NOVEMBER 13, 2025/bh

This is a digitally signed order.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RC.REV. 283/2025, CM APPL. 59057/2025 JEET AHUJA & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: None. versus KARTIK GIRDHAR .....Respondent Through: Mr. Princce Aroraa, Adv. (through VC) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE