Krishan Kumar Malik v. State of NCT of Delhi

O R D E R %

13.11.2025

¶1On the last date of hearing i.e. on 16.10.2025, it was observed as under: "2. The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks time to take instructions regarding the son and wife of the convict being able to stand as surety for him."

¶2The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner states that the son of the petitioner can furnish the surety bond through video conferencing, since he is unable to travel to Delhi. The learned ASC for the State submits that he has no objection to the same.

¶3Accordingly, the son of the petitioner may appear through video conferencing before the concerned Jail Superintendent, and tender the surety bond, which may be accepted as per rules. This is a digitally signed order. 4. In view of the above, the present petition stands disposed of.

¶5The order be uploaded on the website forthwith. DR. SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J NOVEMBER 13, 2025/ns GJ This is a digitally signed order.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 3035/2025 KRISHAN KUMAR MALIK .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sarthak Karol (DHCLSC) with Ms. Neelakshi Bhadauria and Ms. Tanishka Pawar, Advocates versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Yasir Rauf Ansari, ASC for the State with Mr. Alok Sharma, Advocate and SI Sukhvinder Singh, Crime Branch CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMA