Dr.Tripati Talapatra v. National Board of Examinations & Ors

ANIL KUMAR, J. *

Learned counsel for the respondent No.1 on instructions had stated on 20th August, 2009 that the petitioner shall be permitted to appear in the forthcoming examination in DNB(C.T.S.) to be held on 2nd Saturday of December, 2009.

In view of the statement of the learned counsel for the respondent No.1, counsel for the petitioner on instructions states that the writ petition be disposed of as the petitioner has been permitted to appear in DNB(C.T.S.) examination to be held on 2nd Saturday of December, 2009.

Consequently, the writ petition is disposed of in terms of the statement of the learned counsel for the respondent and parties are left to bear their own costs.

All the pending applications are also disposed of.

Dasti.

September 02, 2009

ANIL KUMAR, J. 'rs'

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P(C) No.8431/2009 % Date of Decision: 02.09.2009 Dr. Tripti Talapatra …. Petitioner Through Mr. Hiren Dasan & Mr. Dhirendra Kumar Mishra, Advocates Versus National Board of Examinations & Ors. …. Respondent Through Dr. Rakesh Gosain, Advocate for respondent no. 1. Mr. Jitendra Kumar Singh, Advocate for respondent no. 5. Ms. Amita Singh, Advocate for respondent nos. 6 & 7/UOI. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR 1. Whether reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?