VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2008 › High Court of Delhi

S.N.Awasthi v. M.C.D. & Ors

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
19 March 2008
Bench
Sanjiv Khannaauthor
Case no.
W.P.(C) 17298/2006

Judgment

O R D E R % 19.03.2008

¶1Pursuant to the last order and as there was dispute whether encroachments made in the public street had been removed, I had appointed Mr.Rishi Manchanda, advocate as a Local Commissioner. The lay out plan of the area in question was also furnished to Mr.Rishi Manchanda, advocate to report whether there was any encroachment on public land by the private respondents.

¶2Mr.Rishi Manchanda, advocate has filed his report stating, inter alia, that the public street/gali is clear/from all encroachments. He has also filed photographs in support of the said statement. It is also mentioned in his report that earlier possibly some persons had encroached upon the gali/public street but encroachments have been removed.

¶3In view of the report filed by the Local Commissioner, I do not think any further orders are required to be passed in the present writ petition. MCD will ensure that the public street is not encroached upon and the respondents also directed not to encroach the public street. Periodical inspection of the area at least once in every two months will be done by the Officers of MCD and they shall maintain a spot visit register in this regard. The register will be handed over to the new incumbent whenever there is change of Officer and the new Officer will confirm the factual situation stated in the register.

¶4Learned counsel for MCD states that action as per law will be taken, if there is any unauthorized construction or encroachments by the petitioner.

¶5In these circumstances, I am not inclined to pass any further order on any application or the writ petition. The writ petition and the applications are disposed of.

SANJIV KHANNA,J

MARCH 19, 2008

RN

Case details

Parties and counsel

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 17298/2006 & CM 4269/2008, CM 2203/2008 S.N.AWASTHI ..... Petitioner Through Mr.S.C.Singhal, Adv. versus M.C.D. & ORS. ..... Respondent Through Mr.Ajay Arora with Mr.Kapil Dutta, Advs. for MCD Ms.S.Fatma, Advs. For respondents 3-4. Mr.Rishi Manchanda, Local Commissioner. Mr.S.P.Mehta , Adv. for respondent no.2 with respondent no.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.