VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2011 › High Court of Delhi

Jathedar Prahlad Singh & Ors v. State & Anr

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
22 November 2011
Bench
M.L. Mehtaauthor
Case no.
CRL.M.C. 1597/2011

Judgment

ORDER

22.tL.20t1 This is a petition for quashing of FIR No.29711998, under Sections 4651469134 IPC; registered at P.S. Mukherjee Nagar on the ground that the parties have inter se compromised the matter. Both the parties are present in person and are identified by their respective counsels. The respcindent No. 2, who is the. complainant and the petitioners state that they have compromised the matter and now there is no dispute left. Respondent No. 2 states that he has compromised the matter with the petitioners out of his own free will and volition and without any pressure or coercion of any sort and now, he is left with no grievance against the petitioners and he has no objection if the present FIR is quashed. ,/o a: Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. > In view of these submissions and the fact that the parties have amicably resolve all their disputes, no useful purpose would be served by cgntinuing with the FIR. Accordingly, FIR No. 29711998, under Sections 465/469134 IPC, registered at P.S. Mukherjee Nagar and all the consequential proceedings arising therefrom are herby quashed. Bail bonds of the petitioners are cancelled and their sureties are discharged. The petition and the application stand disposed of accordingly. gh-qr M.L. MEHTA,J NOVEMBER 22,2011 akb

Case details

Parties and counsel

$-6 X. ? IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. rs97 t20n & CRL.M .A. 5877 t201r JATHEDAR PRAHLAD SINGH & ORS. ..... Petitioner Through: Petitioners in person with Mr. V.K.Malik, Advocate. versus STATE & ANR ..... Respondent Ms. Jasbir Kaur, APP. Mr. Chandan Singh, Advocate for complainant/R2 with R2 in person. Through: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.L. MEHTA

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.