- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 27 May 2016
- Bench
- Joint Registrar (Judicial) Sh. Ashutosh Kumar (Dhjs)
- Case no.
- CS(OS) 904/2010
Judgment
O R D E R %
22.12.2016
Affidavit of evidence has been filed. However, the witness who has filed the affidavit of evidence is stated to be the new authorized representative of the plaintiff company and learned counsel for the plaintiff submits that he has moved an application seeking substitution of the authorized representative of the plaintiff company which has yet not been listed. Copy of the same has been supplied to learned counsel for the defendant today in the court.
Relist for further proceedings on 25.01.2017.
In the meantime list of witnesses be filed by both sides by
15.01.2017.
DR. NEERA BHARIHOKE (DHJS)
JOINT REGISTRAR (JUDICIAL) DECEMBER 22, 2016 hk
Case details
Parties and counsel
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 904/2010 M/S MAX NEW YORK LIFE INSURANCE CO LTD..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Deepak Bansal proxy counsel versus M/S VIGHNAHARTA DIRECT INSURANCE BROKING PVT LTD ..... Defendant Through: Mr. Sidharth Shankar Ray & Mr. Amit Kr. Advocates CORAM: DR. NEERA BHARIHOKE (DHJS), JOINT REGISTRAR (JUDICIAL)
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.