- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 31 May 2013
- Bench
- Manmohan Singh
- Case no.
- ARB.P. 202/2013
Follow Delhi High CourtFollow Manmohan Singh
Judgment
ORDER %
31.05.2013 Petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for appointment of an arbitrator. The respondent was served. No reply has been filed. Learned counsel for the respondent has no objection if the prayer made in the petition be allowed. However, he states that accordingto the respondent some of the claims are not arbitrable. The libertybegrantedto the respondentto take the necessary objections before the sole Aibitrator. The suggestion given by the respondentis acceptableto the petitioner. In view of the same, the present petitionis allowed. Accordingly,Justice C.K.Mahajan,a retiredJudge of this Court, R/o B-47, Friends Colony East, Mathura Road, New Delhi-110003 (Mob. No.9818000240) is appointed as a sole Arbiti-ator to adjudicate the disputes including their claims and counter-claims.The Arbitrator shall conduct the proceedings under the provisions of the Signed By:RAM DATT Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and shall give prior notice before commencingthe proceedings.Total fee of the learned Arbitratorshall be payableto the tuneof?1,50,000/-whichshallbe borneby boththe partiesin equal proportion. The petitionis accordinglydisposedof Copies of this order be given dasti to the learned counsel for the parties. Acopy ofthe orderbealso sentto the learnedsole Aititrator.
N SINGH, J. MAY 31, 2013/jk
Case details
Parties and counsel
' $-12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ARB.P. 202/2013 M/S GEODESIC TECHNIQUES PVT LTD Petitioner Through Ms.SangeetaSingh, Adv. withMr.S. Ravi Shanker, Adv. versus M/S ERA INFRA ENGINEERING LTD Respondent Through Mr.Nilava Banerjee, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.