Ge Capital Services India v. Anil Kumar Bansal

ORDER

10.07.2013 Learned counsel for the respondentsays that the reply was filed two days ago. Acopy of the same has been handedover to the learnedcounsel for the petitioner. It is not disputedthatthe arbitrationproceedingsare on. Learnedcounselfor the petitionersubmitsthat, as amatteroffact, the matter is at the stage of evidence. In these circumstances,the captionedpetitionswill be placed before the learnedAi'bitra'torwho will be,freeto treat tlie same as petitionundei Section17 of the Arbitrationand ConciliationAct. Needless,to say that the learned Arbitratorwould be free to pass appropriatedirectionsafter hearingthe submissionsofthe counselsfor the parties. Ms. Marwah says that the respondentbe directed to file a list of assets. Counsel for the respondent says that they will file a list of unencumberedassks,both immovableand movablewithinfour weeksfrom today. Acopy ofthesamewill be furnishedto the counselfoi the petitioner. Thepetitionsare accordinglydisposedof JULY 10,2013 .s.pal O.M.P. 568/2013, 571/2013 & 574/2013 —I RAJIV SHAKDHER, J ,, /A ^°fagc2o/2

$-63, 64 & 66 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P. 568/2013 GE CAPITAL SERVICES INDIA Petitioner Through; Ms. DeepikaV. Marwah,Ms. W. Kasar, Ms. Themthing P.S, Advs. with Mr. AtuI Bansal, AR. versus ANIL KUMAR BANSAL Respondent Through: Mr. SanjeevPathak,Advocate. ) + O.M.P. 571/2013 GE CAPITAL SERVICES INDIA Petitioner Through: Ms. DeepikaV. Marwah,Ms. W. Kasar,Ms. ThemthingP.S,Advs. with Mr. Atul Bansal, AR. versus SUNILBANSAL Respondent Through: Mr. SanjeevPathak,Advocate. + O.M.P. 574/2013 GE CAPITALSERVICESINDIA Petitioner Through: Ms. DeepikaV. Manvah,Ms. W. Kasar, Ms. Themthing P.S, Advs. with Mr. Atul Bansal, AR. versus PAWAN BANSAL Respondent Through: Mr. SanjeevPathak,Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SIIAKDHER OMJ*.568/2013,571/2013&574/2013 P"8^ / of2 r / C/ %