VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2020 › High Court of Delhi

UOI & Ors v. Anand Kumar & Ors

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
15 January 2020
Bench
S.Muralidhar, Talwant Singh
Case no.
W.P.(C) 9004/2005

Judgment

* +

W.P.(C) 9004/2005

UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

..... Petitioners Mr. R. V. Sinha, Mr. A. S. Singh and Mr. Amit Sinha, Advocates.

ANAND KUMAR & ORS.

..... Respondents

Mr. A. K. Trivedi, Advocate.

%

¶1The impugned order of the CAT dated 25th November, 2004 made the relief granted therein subject to the final outcome of the pending C.W.P. 7416-CAT/2006 (O&M) and C.W.P. CWP 15702-CAT/2003 filed by the Union of India in the Punjab and Haryana High Court. The abovesaid writ petitions have been dismissed by way of a judgment dated 6th February, 2013.

¶2Moreover, as noted in the impugned order, similarly placed persons have received favourable orders from the CAT which have been duly implemented by the Respondents.

¶3For the aforementioned reasons, the present petition is also dismissed.

S.MURALIDHAR, J.

TALWANT SINGH, J. JANUARY 15, 2020/nk R-1 * +

W.P.(C) 2082/2017

YOGA EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION (REGD.) ..... Petitioner Ms.Mini Pushkarna, Advocate.

UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Respondent

%

¶1Notice be issued to learned senior counsel Miss Monica for the next date.

¶2List on 15th April, 2020, in the category of "after notice miscellaneous matters".

pa R-30 * +

W.P.(C) 4241/2003 and CM APPL. 7278/2003

ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF POLICE Mr.Naushad Ahmed Khan, ASC.

DINESH KUMAR & ANR. ..... Respondent

%

¶1A fresh notice be issued to the Respondent.

¶2Dasti in addition.

¶3List on 11th May, 2020 in the category of "after notice miscellaneous matters".

pa R-29 * +

W.P.(C) 4004/2003

RAGHVENDRA KUMAR KANSAL

THE DIRECTOR, INTELLIGENCE BUREAU (MHA) ..... Respondent

%

pa R-28 * + W.P.(C) 3833/2003, CM APPL. 6608/2003, CM APPL. 11101/2003, CM APPL.4911/2004, CM APPL.10424/2004, CM APPL.10425/2004, CM APPL.10426/2004 and CM APPL.11310/2004

S.D. NARANG

DIR. GENL. OF METEOROLOGY & ANR.

%

¶2Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. The pending applications are also disposed of. The restoration application, if any, will be entertained only if an appropriate affidavit is filed by the Petitioner in support thereof.

JANUARY 15, 2020/pa R-27 * +

W.P.(C) 3791/2003

K.K. SADASIVAN PILLAI

UNION OF INDIA & ANR.

%

pa R-26 * +

W.P.(C) 3777/2003

RAVINDER SINGH & ORS.

UOI & ORS.

%

pa R-25 * +

W.P.(C) 3609/2003

TUSHAR RANJAN MOHANTY

UOI

%

pa R-24 * +

W.P.(C) 3577/2003

JAGDISH KUMAR

GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS.

%

pa R-23 * +

W.P.(C) 3573/2003

CHANDER SHEIKHAR & ORS.

DIVISIONAL COMM., DELHI & ANR.

%

pa R-22 * +

W.P.(C) 3118/2003

DHARAM BIR THRU L.R"S

DELHI FIRE SERVICE & ANR.

%

pa R-7 * +

W.P.(C) 1734/2007 and CM APPL. 5370/2007

UNION PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

V. THIRUNAVAKKARASU & ORS

%

pa

R-6 * +

W.P.(C) 1025/2003

M.K. KAUL

UOI & ORS.

%

pa R-5 * +

W.P.(C) 558/2003

UNION OF PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION ..... Petitioner

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL

%

pa R-21 * +

W.P.(C) 3080/2003

CONSTABLE SHAKEEL AHMAD

GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS.

%

pa

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.