Lata Grover & Anr v. Atul Murari & Anr

ORDER %

20.07.2011

¶1The counsels for the respondents / alleged contemnor no.1 & 2 states that though there was some delay owing to release of funds by the Government but the order dated 7th January, 2010 in W.P.(C) NO.8720/2009 of which contempt was averred has been complied with. The counsel for the petitioners/relators also admits that the salary has been received till the month of June, 2011. He however avers delay.

¶2Some proposals have been given by the counsels for the respondents no.1 & 2 to obviate such delay in future. However in this contempt jurisdiction, the order of which contempt is sought, cannot be varied. :' Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Liberty is granted to the parties to make appropriate application in this regard in the writ petition.

¶3No case for proceeding further owing to the delay occasioned in complying with the order is made out. The petition is disposed of. JULY 20, 2011 bs RAJIV SAHAI ENDLA W, J

* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CONT.CAS(C) 343/2011 LATA GROVER & ANR ..... Petitioners/Relators Through: Mr. T.D. Yadav, Adv. Versus DR. ATUL MURARI & ANR ..... Respondents/Alleged Contemnors. CORAM: Through: Mr. Jatan Singh, Adv. for UOL Mr. R. V. Sinha, Adv. for R-l. Mr. L.K. Garg, Adv. for R-1 & 2. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLA W