- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 10 November 2016
- Bench
- Sanjeev Sachdeva
- Case no.
- CS(OS) 1218/2011
Judgment
O R D E R %
02.08.2017 IA No.8731/2017
¶1This is an application on behalf of the plaintiff seeking refund of the e-court fee filed on account of an error.
¶2The Suit was decreed by order dated 10.11.2016 and the plaintiff was called upon to file stamp paper in the sum of Rs.4,93,333.33.
¶3Learned counsel for the plaintiff submits that, on account of an inadvertent error, instead of e-stamp paper, e-court fee in the above sum has been filed.
¶4The plaintiff seeks refund of the e-court fee and further extension of time to file e-stamp paper of the said amount.
¶5The office noting of the Registry shows that the Registry has CS(OS) 1218/2011 Page 2 returned the e-court fee under objections.
¶6Since the plaintiff has filed the e-court fee on account of an error and no further court fee is required to be filed, the plaintiff is, thus, entitled to return of the court fee.
¶7The Registry is directed to issue a certificate authorizing the plaintiff to recover the court fee from the appropriate authorities.
¶8The plaintiff shall file e-stamp in the sum of Rs.4,93,333.33, as required by the Registry for preparation of the decree, within two weeks.
¶9The application is, accordingly, allowed. SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J AUGUST 02, 2017 st
Case details
Parties and counsel
CS(OS) 1218/2011 Page 1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 1218/2011 SHIV KUMAR SONI ..... Plaintiff Through Mr. Pawan K. Bahl, Advocate. versus HARISH KUMAR SONI & ORS ..... Defendants Through None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.