VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2024 › High Court of Delhi

Pawan Singh v. State (Nct of Delhi)

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
7 November 2024
Bench
Anish Dayalauthor
Case no.
W.P.(CRL) 3386/2024

Follow Delhi High CourtFollow Anish Dayal

Judgment

O R D E R %

07.11.2024

¶1Pursuant to the previous order dated 05th November, 2024, an updated nominal roll has been placed on record by the Jail Superintendent along with status report.

¶2In paragraph 5 of the said status report it is recorded that the petitioner was released on furlough on 09th February, 2024 and 11th July, 2024, furnishing cash surety of Rs. 10,000/- along with personal bond of like amount to the satisfaction of Jail Superintendent. This was in consonance with the orders of furlough dated 05th February, 2024 and 05th July, 2024.

¶3Petitioner has already undergone sentence as on 5th November 2024 for 14 years, 05 months and 05 days as per the status report.

¶4The parole has been sought for the purpose of marriage of petitioner's daughter and the booking of marriage venue is in Ghaziabad, U.P., which The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. fact has been verified and noted in the order dated 05th November, 2024 of this Court.

¶5From the nominal roll it is also evident that petitioner has been granted parole and furlough on various occasions since 2015 onwards and has not misused the liberty, except on one occasion in the year 2024, when there was a late surrender of 05 days.

¶6Accordingly, petitioner is enlarged on parole in FIR No. 66/2010 registered at P.S. Harsh Vihar under Section 302 IPC, for a period of 04 weeks from the date of release subject to furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the Jail Superintendent, subject to the following conditions:- i. During the period the petitioner remains out on parole, the petitioner shall stay at his declared residence at Mandoli Extension, Delhi and shall report through video call to the SHO, Police Station-Harsh Vihar, Delhi on every Saturday at 5 p.m. ii. The petitioner shall also provide the SHO, Police Station-Harsh Vihar, Delhi with mobile telephone number which shall be kept in working condition at all times and shall not switch off or change the mobile number without prior intimation to the SHO concerned. iii. The petitioner shall not indulge in any criminal activity and shall not communicate with or come in contact with the complainant/victim or any member of the complainant/victim's family or tamper with the evidence of the case. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. iv. The petitioner is directed to surrender before the jail authorities at the expiry of the period of parole.

¶7Accordingly, the petition is disposed of.

¶8Copy of the order be sent to the Jail Superintendent for information and necessary compliance.

¶9Order be uploaded on the website of this Court. ANISH DAYAL, J NOVEMBER 7, 2024 DU/na The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

Case details

Parties and counsel

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 3386/2024 PAWAN SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Siddharth Yadav and Mr. Prashant Jain, Advocates. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Yasir Rauf Ansari, ASC for State with Mr. Alok Sharma and Mr. Vasu Agarwal, Advocates and SI Nitin Kumar, PS Harsh Vihar. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYAL

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.