- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 22 July 2013
- Bench
- Manmohan
- Case no.
- W.P.(C) 4538/2013
Judgment
ORDER %
22.07.2013 The present writ petitions have been filed praying for a directionto the respondentto take necessaryactionfor regularisation and de-sealing of the demised premises. Learnedcounselfor the petitionersstatesthat despitea Division Benchofthis Courtdirectingthe respondenton 12^*^ December,2011 to dispose of the petitioners' representations within twelve weeks, the respondent has, till date, not decided the petitioners' representations dated 30^*^ December,2011. Since despite service of advance copy of the petitions and a pass over none is present for the respondent, this Court has no other option but to proceed ahead with these matters. Consequently, the present writ petitions and pending applications are disposed of with a direction to the respondent through its Estate Officer to dispose of the petitioners' representations dated 30^^December,2011 withinsix weeks from today. Learned counsel for the petitioners is directed to supply a copy of this order to the Estate Officer within a period of one week. With the aforesaid observations and directions, both the writ petitions and applications stand disposed of MANM0H7«^, j JULY 22, 2013 NG
Case details
Parties and counsel
21-22 + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 4537/2013 & CM Appl. Nos. 10444-10445/2013 SUSHIL KUMAR Petitioner Through: Mr. Shekhar Nanavaty, Advocate versus DELHICANTONMENTBOARD Respondent Through: None AND .P.(C) 4538/2013 & CM Appl. Nos. 10446-10447/2013 M.K. MITTAL Petitioner Through: Mr. Shekhar Nanavaty, Advocate versus DELHICANTONMENTBOARD Respondent Through: None CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.