Adobe Systems Incorporated v. Atul Gupta & Ors

ORDER %

31.05.2013

¶1The counsels for the plaintiff and the defendants support the application.

¶2The applicationis statedtobe signedby the authorizedrepresentative of the plaintiff and by the defendantno.1 as well as by the authorized signatory of the defendants no.2 to 4 Companies and their respective advocatesandis also accompaniedby the affidavitsof the signatoriesto the application. The applicationis also accompaniedwith an inventory of softwarelicenserequirementof the defendants,Resolutionsof the Board of Directors of the defendants no.2 to 4 and photocopy of cheques issued by the defendants no.2&3 in favour of the advocates for the plaintiffs.

¶3Thecompromiseasrecordedinthe applicationis foundtobe lawful.

¶4The application is allowed. CS(OS) 914/2013 Page 1 of2 Signed By:RAM DATT Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. V

¶5The undertakings of the parties as contained in the application are accepted and the parties ordered to be bound thereby and cautioned of consequencesof breachthereof

¶6The suit is decreed in terms of the compromise application which shall form part of the decree sheet.

¶7Decree sheet be drawn up.

¶8The dateof25^^ September,2013 alreadyscheduledis cancelled. MAY 31, 2013 'gsr' CS(OS) 914/2013 RAJIV SAHAIENDLAW, J Page 2 of2

46$^ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI lA No.9871/2013 (of the parties u/0 23 R-3 CPC) in CS(OS) 914/2013 & lA No.8034/2013 (u/0 39 R-1&2 CPC) ADOBE SYSTEMS INCORPORATED Plaintiff Through: Mr. Karan Kamra, Adv. versus ATUL GUPTA & ORS. Through; Defendants Mr. Naveen Tripathi & Mr. S.M. Tripathi, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW