Vijay Kumar Nautiyal & Ors v. Rajender Kumar Secy Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr

ORDER %

01.11.2011

¶1An office note has been put up by the Registry stating inter alia that due to bonafide inadvertence, a reply filed by the NDMC in Contempt Case No.202/2007 under index dated 25.05.2011 has been placed in the file of this case, whereas it relates to the aforesaid case. The Registry is directed to detach the aforesaid reply placed on record of this case and place it in the appropriate file.

¶2The petitioners have filed the present contempt petition praying inter alia for initiation of contempt proceedings against the respondents for non-compliance of the judgment dated 29.11.2010, passed in a batch of matters including LPA No.1653-58/2005 entitled, Viiav Nautival & Ors.Vs. GNCTD of Delhi & Ors'. CONT.CAS(C)382/2011 Page No.l of 2 Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing.

¶3At the outset, counsel for the respondents/GNCT of Delhi states that the department is in the process of implementing the aforesaid judgment and it is expected that the process shall be completed within two weeks from today.

¶4In view of the aforesaid submission made by counsel for the respondents/GNCT of Delhi, counsel for the petitioners states that she does not wish to press this petition. The same Is accordingly disposed of with directions to the respondents to ensure that necessary compliancesof the aforesaid judgment are made preferably within a period of four weeks from today. HIMA KOHLI,J NOVEMBER 01, 2011 "anb' CONT.CAS(C)382/2011 Page No.2 of 2 V

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CONT.CAS(C) 382/2011 VDAY KUMAR NAUTIYAL & ORS Petitioners Through: l^r. Sajeev Kumar, Adv. versus RAJENDER KUI^IAR SECY GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR Respondents Through: i^ir. S.Q. Kazim, Adv. with |V|r. Alim Mizaj, Adv. CORAI^^: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI