VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2024 › High Court of Delhi

Bharat Bhushan Bansal v. State NCT of Delhi

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
6 November 2024
Bench
Amit Mahajanauthor
Case no.
CRL.M.C. 8681/2024

Follow Delhi High CourtFollow Amit Mahajan

Judgment

O R D E R %

06.11.2024 CRL.M.A. 33177/2024 (for exemption)

¶1Exemptions allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

¶2The application stands disposed of. CRL.M.C. 8681/2024

¶3The present petition is filed seeking following reliefs: "a. Allow instant petition and issue appropriate directions to the Ld. Trial Court for expeditious disposal of case bearing no. Cr. Case No. 14327/2023 titled as "State Vs, Bharat Bhushan Bansal" which is pending in the court of Ms. Divya Arora, Ld. JMFC, North West, Rohini Courts, Delhi, and/or, b. Issue appropriate directions to the Ld. Trial Court for passing appropriate order on charge or discharge, as the case may be, and in case the applicant is not discharged then further directions may be given for framing of charges against the applicant/accused Mr. Bharat Bhushan Bansal in the case bearing no. Cr. Case No. 14327/2023 titled as "State Vs. Bharat Bhushan This is a digitally signed order. Bansal" which is pending in the court of Ms. Divya Arora, Ld. JMFC, North West, Rohini Courts, Delhi, on the next date of hearing, ie, 12.11.2024.and/or c. To pass any other appropriate order or direction which this Hon'ble court may deem just and proper may also be passed in favour of the applicant in the interest of justice."

¶4The FIR was registered on 01.06.2023 pursuant to which chargesheet was filed on 04.12.2023.

¶5The grievance of the petitioner is that no order on charge has been passed as yet and the petitioner is languishing in custody.

¶6The petitioner is entitled to file an application seeking regular bail. However, no directions can be passed which would be in the nature of controlling the board of the learned Trial Court.

¶7Even otherwise, the chargesheet was filed only on

04.12.2023 and it cannot be held at this stage that the trial has been unnecessarily prolonged.

¶8In view of the above, this Court does not consider it apposite to entertain the present petition at this stage and the petition is, therefore, dismissed. AMIT MAHAJAN, J NOVEMBER 6, 2024 "SS" This is a digitally signed order.

Case details

Parties and counsel

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 8681/2024 BHARAT BHUSHAN BANSAL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Karan Suneja & Ms. Manvi Khurana, Advs. versus STATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Naresh Kumar Chahar, APP for the State SI Yogesh Sharma & SI Kartik Maan, PS- DIV/NWD CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJAN

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.