- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 6 November 2024
- Bench
- Rekha Palli, Saurabh Banerjee
- Case no.
- FAO(OS) (COMM) 240/2024
Follow Delhi High CourtFollow Rekha PalliFollow Saurabh Banerjee
Judgment
O R D E R %
06.11.2024 CM APPL. 64964/2024
¶1Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
¶2The application stands disposed of. FAO(OS) (COMM) 240/2024 CM APPL. 64962/2024 (requisition the record in digital format) CM APPL. 64963/2024 (delay of 16 days (F))
¶3At the very outset, learned counsel for the appellant seeks leave to withdraw the appeal with liberty to assail the impugned order by way of appropriate remedies in accordance with law.
¶4Accordingly, while disposing of the appeal alongwith pending applications, as not pressed with liberty as prayed for, we make it clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the impugned order and therefore, it will be open for the appellant to raise all permissible grounds including grounds raised in the present This is a digitally signed order. appeal in any legal proceeding which the appellant may choose to initiate as per law. REKHA PALLI, J SAURABH BANERJEE, J NOVEMBER 6, 2024 kk This is a digitally signed order.
Case details
Parties and counsel
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO(OS) (COMM) 240/2024 HYPERFYBRE PVT LTD .....Appellant Through: Mr.Aditya Wadhwa, Mr.Siddharth Sunil, Mr.Akhilesh Kumar & Mr.Arunav Sharma, Advs. versus PRATHIK SHARMA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.