VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2024 › High Court of Delhi

Raj v. Union of India & Anr

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
6 November 2024
Bench
Jyoti Singhauthor
Case no.
W.P.(C) 15483/2024

Follow Delhi High CourtFollow Jyoti Singh

Judgment

O R D E R %

06.11.2024 CM APPL. 64977/2024

¶1Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

¶2Application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 15483/2024 and CM APPL. 64976/2024

¶3This writ petition has been filed by the Petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following reliefs against Delhi Police, New Delhi, which is notified under Section 14 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985: I. Pass appropriate writ, order or direction thereby directing the respondents to re-measure the height of the Petitioner from a Govt. Hospital, if considered appropriate after getting a medical board constituted preferably in All India Institute of Medical Sciences; II. Direct the respondents to select the petitioner for the post of Sub-Inspector in Delhi Police if his height is found as per requirements by the Medical Board/Doctors, as notified vide notification dated 04.03.2024;

This is a digitally signed order. 4. In view of the judgment of the Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court in L. Chandra Kumar v. Union of India and Others, (1997) 3 SCC 261 as well as the decision of the Division Bench of this Court in Parikshit Grewal and Others v. Union of India and Another, 2024 SCC OnLine Del 6939, the Central Administrative Tribunal will be the only Court of first instance to adjudicate the issues raised by the Petitioner.

¶5At this stage, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner seeks to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to approach the appropriate forum.

¶6Pending application also stands disposed of.

JYOTI SINGH, J NOVEMBER 06, 2024/shivam

This is a digitally signed order.

Case details

Parties and counsel

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 15483/2024 RAJ .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Vinod Kumar and Mr.Shashank Sharma, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Mahamaya Chatterjee and Ms. Antara Chowdhury, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.