- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 7 November 2024
- Bench
- Amit Mahajan
- Case no.
- BAIL APPLN. 4050/2024
Follow Delhi High CourtFollow Amit Mahajan
Judgment
O R D E R %
07.11.2024 CRL.M.A. 33403/2024 (exemption from filing certified copies of the annexures)
¶1Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
¶2The application stands disposed of. BAIL APPLN. 4050/2024
¶3The present application is filed seeking regular bail in FIR No. 342/2024 dated 02.08.2024, registered at Police Station Harsh Vihar, for offences under Sections 118(1)/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
¶4The FIR was registered on an allegation that the complainant was standing on the gate of his house, when his neighbours, that are, the applicant, his brother and his father, started misbehaving with the complainant that allegedly led to a scuffle.
¶5It is alleged that the applicant hit the complainant with a sharp object and the other co-accused persons gave beatings to The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. the complainant which led to injuries which are stated to be simple in nature.
¶6The bail application filed by the applicant was dismissed noting that the father and the brother of the applicant were harassing the complainant and his family despite the fact that the applicant is undergoing judicial custody. It was noted that such conduct of the co-accused reflected no respect for the criminal justice machinery.
¶7Undisputedly, the chargesheet has already been filed in the present case and the applicant is in custody since 02.08.2024. The applicant, therefore, is no longer required for any further investigation. In regard to the conduct of the co-accused persons, it is pointed out that a separate FIR has already been registered against them.
¶8The State is at liberty to take all actions against the co-accused persons in accordance with law.
¶9The same, however, in the opinion of this Court, cannot be a ground for denying the bail to the applicant. The applicant cannot be held responsible for the conduct of the co-accused persons when he is admittedly in custody.
¶10In view of the above, in the opinion of this Court, the applicant has made out a case for grant of bail and is directed to be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond for a sum of ₹25,000/- with two sureties of the like amount, subject to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court, on the following conditions: a. The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case or The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. tamper with the evidence of the case, in any manner whatsoever; b. The applicant shall under no circumstance leave the country without the permission of the learned Trial Court; c. The applicant shall appear before the learned Trial Court as and when directed; d. The applicant shall provide the address where he would be residing after his release and shall not change the address without informing the concerned IO/ SHO; e. The applicant shall, upon his release, give his mobile number to the concerned IO/SHO and shall keep his mobile phone switched on at all times.
¶11In the event of there being any FIR/DD entry / complaint lodged against the applicant, it would be open to the State to seek redressal by filing an application seeking cancellation of bail.
¶12It is clarified that any observations made in the present order are for the purpose of deciding the present bail application and should not influence the outcome of the trial and also not be taken as an expression of opinion on the merits of the case.
¶13The bail application is allowed in the aforementioned terms. AMIT MAHAJAN, J NOVEMBER 7, 2024 'Aman' The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
Case details
Parties and counsel
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 4050/2024 KUNDAN .....Applicant Through: Mr. Ravinder Kumar & Mr. Santosh Dixit, Advocates. versus THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Naresh Kumar Chahar, APP for the State. SI Nitin Kumar (P.S. Harsh Vihar). CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJAN
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.