M/S Chintamani Food and Snack v. Satya Prakash

O R D E R %

07.11.2024 [Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request)] CM APPL. 65073/2024 (exemption)

¶1Allowed, subject to all just exceptions CM APPL. 65074/2024 (exemption from filing complete TCR)

¶2The petitioner is directed to place on record the complete trial court record within two weeks as assured. Accordingly, the application stands disposed of. CM APPL. 65072/2024 (stay)

¶3After addressing partly, learned counsel for petitioner seeks pass-over to obtain instructions as to whether this petition has to be withdrawn, because 50% of lump sum compensation has already been directed to be released to the workman by the execution court and for the present proceedings also, the petitioner would have to pay litigation expenses, so economically it may not be viable to pursue this petition according to learned counsel for petitioner. This is a digitally signed order. 4. As requested, recall after lunch.

GIRISH KATHPALIA, J NOVEMBER 7, 2024/rk

¶5In this post lunch session, learned counsel for petitioner has appeared with instructions of his client to make a request for withdrawal of this petition. As requested, the petition and the applications are dismissed as withdrawn.

GIRISH KATHPALIA, J NOVEMBER 7, 2024/as

Click here to check corrigendum, if any

This is a digitally signed order.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 15499/2024 M/S CHINTAMANI FOOD AND SNACK .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Upendra Pratap Singh, Advocate versus SATYA PRAKASH .....Respondent Through: Ms. Ritu Jain, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA